Comment on Nothing is requiring employees to be in the office five days a week
Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
Excuse for layoff. What I hear from the article is a CEO, who himself is not a grown up, crying me, me, me, my company, my profit, selfish behavior without any concern for his employees who have largely contributed to his startup success.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Humans have a “me” problem in general. The secret is not to create conditions for it to manifest itself.
Anti-monopoly laws, unions, distribution of power, openness, readiness to break nonsense laws, stubbornness in defending important laws, understanding of common sense both in following and in breaking the law, and the same that applies to laws applies to any moral principles.
You know, consciousness of good and evil, wisdom of all the enormous amount of good literature available for anyone able to read in English and other most spoken languages.
Just being human and understanding that no device of human making can “solve” human nature.
I’d say Tolkien and Lewis on the fantasy side, Heinlein and Asimov and Simak on the sci-fi side, and Lem in between them. Some Jules Verne and Sabatini would be good too. I have a reflex to Russian classics due to having been force-fed them in childhood, but there are things worth learning. And Lucian of Samosata.
Carpe diem, memento mori, astra inclinant sed non obligant. OK, I think my head needs a reboot.
floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 weeks ago
When it comes to addressing the “me” problem, Buddha has to be on the list of people with advice worth checking out. It may run deep, but modern capitalism encourages and nurtures the worst of it. A lot of the issues we see aren’t due to any unchangeable human nature, but capitalists will try to persuade us they are.
rottingleaf@lemmy.world 3 weeks ago
Thank you, yes, Buddha is.
I also forgot Tao Te Ching.
We-ell, one of the reasons I emotionally hate communism is because I’ve grown in Russia and have deep acquaintance with some things which were being planted just like you describe, but by Soviet education.
An example: someone has a hobbyist project, that project becomes useful for their group, the group (without any participation) takes pride in it as “our” project, then later that someone makes a weak squeal about not even credit, but their own wishes to continue their hobby by their own understanding, the group judges them heavily and makes them repent. In Soviet moralist stories the person with the initiative would be the one to blame for “selfishness”, while their contribution would be considered “as expected” (because they owe the “collective” everything they can do), so the rest of the group who’ve done nothing useful would be “better” (because they don’t have to do anything, just use what belongs to the “collective”) and that person would have to redeem themselves. No irony, no nuance, just this.