Comment

Comment on Vodafone Finds Brits Keep Mobile Phones for 4 Years Instead of 2

FriendlyBeagleDog@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I could understand upgrading so frequently at the advent of mainstream smartphones, where two years of progress actually did represent a significant user experience improvement - but the intergenerational improvements for most people’s day-to-day use have been marginal for quite some time now.

source

Sort:hotnew top

OscarRobin@lemmy.world ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
Yeah my semi-techie friend still has an S9+ from over 5 years ago and honestly he isn’t really missing anything beyond a few iterative improvements.

source
- dukeGR4@monyet.cc ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  
  S9+ from over 5 years ago
  
  he’s been missing out on 3 years + of security updates kek
  
  *cries in Samsung
  
  source
agent_flounder@lemmy.one ⁨10⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
If the batteries were easily replaceable, and the software didn’t continually get bloated, and companies kept issuing security patches, sure.

I kept my last desktop system for 10 years. Actually I still have it and it performs sort of ok (I was running Mint the whole time). But I upgraded and the performance improvement was actually worth the considerable cost. I’ve gotten similar life out of my other desktops and laptops over the years.

I think at least 5 years or preferably 10 is reasonable for smart phones.

source