Comment on GitHub - Owez/yark: YouTube archiving made simple.

• Smash@lemmy.self-hosted.site ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

  I tried it but it’s pretty complex compared to tubesync and uses weird af filenames, unusable for media servers

  source

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca ⁨4⁩ ⁨weeks⁩ ago

    Yeah, the weird filenames bothers me, too. It does take a hit to data portability, for sure. I’m not using it for some kind of long-term, bomb-proof YouTube archiving, but more to have offline access to instructional videos I might need in the near future. For that, the UI and integration with Jellyfin works well for me.

    If I was actually collecting youtube videos, I would go with something else that generates human-friendly folders and filenames! I’ll bookmark Tubesync :)

    source