Comment on Families distressed after 'highly misleading' video used by anti-Voice campaigners goes viral

<- View Parent
looeee@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

“Should aboriginals have a say in parliament?”

What that means is saved for future debate. Is deliberately vague so that parliament can decide how it’s implemented and most importantly change it in the future without having another referendum.

The referendum is necessary to change the constitution, as that’s the only process available to do so.

So all they’re asking is whether the aboriginal voice should be heard when deciding on laws.

The no campaign are calling it racist because it’s giving special treatment to one group. Of course, if most of them hadn’t been slaughtered then they would not be such a minority in the first place.

source
Sort:hotnewtop