Comment on Why are people downvoting the MediaBiasFactChecker not?
Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 month agoWell, sure, it’s always going to be run somehow. Things do tend to be owned by people in our system. You could say it should be a nonprofit if you wanted, that’d be fair.
And yes, I’d expect a single person would be unable to handle the workload. In addition to reading and fact checking, there’s also the admin stuff, where someone has to run the website, handle expenses, shit like that.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Yes people to help the disinformation.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Uh huh. I think you just like far left propaganda. Your willingness to just whine in vague, general terms about everything without offering anything substantial in the way of criticism sort of betrays you as just participating in some sort of brigading-type thing.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Oh there’s been plenty of substantial criticism, with examples. If you’re not seeing them in this comment section it’s because you don’t want to.
Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I was just talking about our conversation. “Conservative!” “Corporation!” “Opposite of a corporation!” “Has a team!”
Not particularly substantial stuff. I did see your other, much better comment in here, and left a reply.