Comment on Valve runs its massive PC gaming ecosystem with only about 350 employees

• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  At this point steam is plain rent, coasting on their monopolistic platform power not any particular technical merit. It would be fine if valve spent this money on their userbase, but they don’t. All their other products are run for profit as well.

  source

  • knitwitt@lemmy.world ⁨2⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Stream created and maintains a platform that gamers and developers want to use but more importantly, they’ve built up a reputation that people believe in and trust.

    Gamers and developers are so eager to use steam because in all the years they’ve been operating, they still support and expand upon family sharing, have a fantastic refund policy (for consumers), don’t employ aggressive exclusivity deals, don’t limit download speeds behind paywalls, and provide a great review and recommendation system.

    They’ve become successful due to this reputation, why should we punish them for that?

    source

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      They’re an http download website that takes a 30% cut on the hard work of artists.

      That is already reprehensible, but not illegal.

      They also dominate their market and their competition is laughable.

      Now that is a properly punishable crime.

      source

      • knitwitt@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Developers can and almost always do close to offer their games on multiple platforms and can even choose self hosted direct distribution of they do choose. Customers can choose to purchase their games on steam, itch, epic, Microsoft, or any of the many places they’re often hosted simultaneously. Steam is more often than not the choice people choose to use of their own free will because they perceive it as being the superior service.

        Why do you believe excellence should be punished?

        source