I mean, it’s fair to compare the two techs but that’s different from suggesting that you need a single approach to generation. No one is seriously suggesting that only solar for generation is sensible
I mean, it’s fair to compare the two techs but that’s different from suggesting that you need a single approach to generation. No one is seriously suggesting that only solar for generation is sensible
PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I’m not sure if this is your first conversation on the topic but the debate is almost entirely on renewables vs nuclear.
poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 months ago
There are many other types of renewables than just solar.
PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Really? Wow! Thanks!
poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 months ago
You are not arguing in good faith if you use exclusively solar in one sentence and then make sweeping generalisations about renewables in another. And yes, consider this a final warning from a mod of this community.
kaffiene@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Did you notice yourself using the word “solar” in this conversation rather than “renewables”?
PixelatedSaturn@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Yes. I used renewables. But I used solar before because that was specifically the conversation. What a funny and irrelevant question.
kaffiene@lemmy.world 3 months ago
FFS if you can’t see that changing the topic of conversation effects the meaning of people’s responses then I don’t know what to tell you. I’m done here