Nah.
Comment on Disney hack leads to 1.2TB of Slack communications leaked online
KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
So we gonna finally accept that maybe all these cloud services aren’t that secure
sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
5redie8@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
Taking this part of the description at face value anyway, this sounds like the opposite of the cloud.
That being said, I still agree with the statement
bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
I don’t think Slack has a self hosted version, and does not offer IP allow listing. There’s nothing preventing someone to go to disney.slack.com. I think when they say “internal” they mean for internal employees, and not like a thing for fans.
addie@feddit.uk 2 months ago
I think when Disney demands an internally-hosted version of your product, then the sales team tells engineering that they’ll provide one, and mark the price up accordingly. That kind of thing doesn’t appear on the external listing for everyone else.
cmhe@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Wgy would disney demand that?
Why would they choose slack if they want to host, maintain and be responsible for the internal chat themselves?
They choose slack because they do it for them so that they don’t have to do it themselves. That is the selling point for them.
femtech@midwest.social 2 months ago
UtMan1988@lemmy.world 2 months ago
They do. You pay extra for it. You have to have apache or a web server configured for it, and a lot of space. Source: I configured one like 4 years ago.
bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 months ago
I’ve never heard of an on prem offering, which tier is that on? None of the plans mention it? slack.com/pricing
ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
That sounds like user error on Disney’s part then.