these thinga are too dissimilar to be compared meaningfully. Like if some article says which is the best tool? And they give you a rake, a network router, and a nailgun. Then you meed context.
I think to OPs point though, is that all of those who things can be compared. The context of the article is what makes them incomparable. But if you asked me to compare a router to a nailgun I could talk durability, power draw, intended function, materials, relative ability to make it through TSA, etc etc.
Literally no two things are fundamentally incomparable. Things are only incomparable in specific contexts.
BCsven@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
You repeat exactly what you quoted me on…you need context to compare
masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 months ago
No, things always have inherent context by nature of being things. Context can be used to make things incomparable, but they’re always inherently comparable without explicit context.