I don’t understand the overarching point of this comment.
Comment on Microsoft is reportedly banning Palestinians in the U.S. for life for calling relatives in Gaza
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 months agowww.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/…/7644/
Early in 2001, the commission presented a report to the incoming G.W. Bush administration warning that terrorism would be the nation’s greatest national security problem, and saying that unless the United States took proper protective measures a terrorist attack was likely within its borders. Neither the president nor the vice president nor any other senior official from the new administration took time to meet with the commission members or hear about their findings.
The commission had 14 members, split 7-7, Republican and Democrat, as is de rigeur for bodies of this type. Today Hart told me that in the first few meetings, commission members would go around the room and volunteer their ideas about the nation’s greatest vulnerabilities, most urgent needs, and so on.
At the first meeting, one Republican woman on the commission said that the overwhelming threat was from China. Sooner or later the U.S. would end up in a military showdown with the Chinese Communists. There was no avoiding it, and we would only make ourselves weaker by waiting. No one else spoke up in support.
The same thing happened at the second meeting – discussion from other commissioners about terrorism, nuclear proliferation, anarchy of failed states, etc, and then this one woman warning about the looming Chinese menace. And the third meeting too. Perhaps more.
Finally, in frustration, this woman left the commission.
“Her name was Lynne Cheney,” Hart said. “I am convinced that if it had not been for 9/11, we would be in a military showdown with China today.” Not because of what China was doing, threatening, or intending, he made clear, but because of the assumptions the Administration brought with it when taking office. (My impression is that Chinese leaders know this too, which is why there are relatively few complaints from China about the Iraq war. They know that it got the U.S. off China’s back!)
ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 months ago
Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Military Industrial Complex needs to be fed.
ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 months ago
In reply to a conment about racism and Islamophobia, mentioning that “Liz Cheney thought we’d be going to war with China” doesn’t really track.
HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 4 months ago
So what you’re saying is Lynne Cheney has been wrong for 23 years so far.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Plenty of folks on here have bought into the China Boogeyman narrative. Her family’s propaganda has been devastatingly effective. We likely will be at war with China in another generation, given our current trajectory.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 months ago
China isn’t blameless. Factory and camp narratives aside, their naval actions are bellicose.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Image
The atrocities that western nations have had to commit to keep a foothold in places like Osaka, the Philippines, Indonesia, Pakistan, and India really disqualify any of these folks from claiming another country is “bellicose”. We’re still out in Oceania committing genocides of native peoples, to this day.
That’s before you get into some belly-aching about a Chinese warship sailing through the Straight of Taiwan, as though its not American property.
HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Why would China engage in military conflict with the USA when they can just sit back and watch the USA collapse on its own?