I can’t tell if you’re suggesting that foundation models (which is the underpinning technology of LLMs) aren’t being used for the things that I said they’re being used for, but I can assure you they are, either in commercial R&D or in live commercial pictures l products.

The fact that they shouldn’t be used for these things is something we can certainly agree on, but the fact remains that they are.

Sources:

• Wayve is using foundation models for driving, and I am under the impression that their neutral net extends all the way from sensor input to motor control: wayve.ai/thinking/introducing-gaia1/

• Research recommending the use of LLMs for giving financial advice: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=48500…

• LLMs for therapy: blog.langchain.dev/mental-health-therapy-as-an-ll…

So this all kinds of goes back to my point that some form of accountability is needed for how these tools get used. I haven’t examined the specific legislation proposal to give any firm opinion on it, but I think it’s a good thing that the conversation is happening in a serious way.