Comment on Authy got hacked, and 33 million user phone numbers were stolen

• NateNate60@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Of course it’s stealing. But they didn’t break in.

  Hacking = breaking in

  Data breach = stealing stuff

  source

  • lando55@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    What about this scenario:

    • you keep your main garage door, side doors, and windows locked
    • provide a key to anyone who wants to borrow your lawnmower or whatever
    • someone discovers a window you mistakenly left unlocked and starts using it to take stuff without using a key

    Would this be considered breaking in? Probably. Here is where the analogy breaks down; if I were to leave the front door of my house unlocked, even if there’s a welcome mat outside, anyone who enters without my knowledge or consent can be charged with breaking and entering (yes, even though no actual breaking is involved).

    The interesting thing with public APIs is that there are generally terms and conditions associated with creating an account and acquiring a key, though if you are hitting an unauthenticated endpoint you technically never agreed to them. In this particular case with Authy, it would probably be argued that the intent was to acquire data by exploiting a vulnerability in the custodian’s system and use it for nefarious purposes or profit. I’d call it a hack.

    source

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      The scenario you described would not be breaking in.

      Terms and conditions being agreed to are not relevant for this purpose. An exposed API is one that is welcome to be exploited. If you’re not requiring an API key, you’re essentially saying “This API is free for anyone to use” for security purposes, regardless of what you say in the terms and conditions.

      source