Comment on China is attempting to mirror the entire GitHub over to their own servers, users report
Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 months agoNo, I’m pointing out that China doesn’t care about your dictionary.
Comment on China is attempting to mirror the entire GitHub over to their own servers, users report
Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 months agoNo, I’m pointing out that China doesn’t care about your dictionary.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 months ago
If someone infringes on a copyright that doesn’t mean the work isn’t copyrighted. You can’t just say things that are source available are open source. Even if someone is infringing on the rights holders they’re still only source available.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 months ago
In countries following that legal regime.
JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 months ago
You’re being obtuse. I get the point you’re trying to make – you’ve been heard. I’m just saying those aren’t the terms you should be using to make it. Open source has a very distinct definition and it has to do with the licenses covering the code. It has nothing to do with whether different countries have differing laws. Code cannot be open source in one country and not open source in another because the definition has nothing to do with countries. In fact, that would specifically not be open source because it gives rights to some and not others.
Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 months ago
The problem is we aren’t in a thread talking about Apple stealing code. We’re in a thread about China doing it. And people in here are like, “that’s illegal! It’s not actually open source!”
Which is why I’m driving this point so hard.