Comment

Comment on Microsoft says “Prism” translation layer does for Arm PCs what Rosetta did for Macs

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

That’s assuming the writer knows what they’re talking about. Last line from the second paragraph:

Windows 11 has similar translation capabilities, and with the Windows 11 24H2 update, that app translation technology is getting a name: Prism.

And first line from the third paragraph.

Microsoft says that Prism isn’t just a new name for the same old translation technology.

Sort:hotnew top

woelkchen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

That’s assuming the writer knows what they’re talking about.

Certainly more than you because Prism emulates an x86 CPU and WINE doesn’t, therefore the WINE comparison is still wrong.

source
- n2burns@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
  This article seems to conflate “emulation” and “translation layer”. I don’t think there is anything that confirms “Prism emulates an x86 CPU”, only that it allows for running x86 code on ARM. This does not inherently require emulation as demonstrated by Rosetta 2, which is a translation layer.
  
  source
  - woelkchen@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    
    only that it allows for running x86 code on ARM. This does not inherently require emulation as demonstrated by Rosetta 2, which is a translation layer.
    
    WINE doesn’t “translate” one CPU architecture to another CPU architecture either, so the WINE comparison is still wrong, no mater if CPU translation is called emulation or not. WINE is a wrapper for API calls within the same CPU architecture. That’s it.
    
    source
    n2burns@lemmy.ca ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago
    
    WINE doesn’t “translate” one CPU architecture to another CPU architecture
    
    Wrong again.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments