Hey, uh, fantasykid. What’s going on with your post history? If I didn’t know better, I’d say you made an account to specifically post just from a single source and interact with the community not at all otherwise. It’s not like that would be against any rules or anything; you could be a bot for all anyone knows.

As for the article itself… If I didn’t know better, I’d say a bot wrote it. From the byline attribution of “NEWSLINE PAPER” (If that name isn’t enough to assuage your worry, worry no more: it’s BASED ON TRUSTED SOURCE, too) to the attributed but unreferenced “recent study published in the journal Brain and Behavior” to the conflation of the perception of time’s passage during flow states with the actual dilation of time due to relativistic effects to the bad, false explanation of this conflation attributed to “Space” instead of the introductory paragraph of the aforementioned unreferenced but attributed study (in which it uses a comparison between relativistic effects and the flow states as a comparative metaphor)- I’d say this is a bad faith effort at imitating science journalism in order to generate click revenue.