Still ignoring the fact that this technology was advertised to arrive by 2017. It’s seven years overdue.
That’s false fucking advertising.
Comment on Tesla must face fraud suit for claiming its cars could fully drive themselves
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 6 months ago
Ironically this comes at a time when FSD is getting so good that the car does indeed practically drive itself. It’s still level 2 but the amount of driver interventions reguired to reach your destination has dropped to near zero. I don’t think we’re very far at all from an actual robotaxi and the ability to use your personal vehicle as such.
sebinspace@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Aceticon@lemmy.world 5 months ago
It’s seven years overdue so far.
FIFY.
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 5 months ago
I don’t know what this has to do with what I said. It’s long overdue, yes. It was false advertising, yes. It’s incredibly good nowdays, yes. Several things can be true at the same time.
sebinspace@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Forgive the imperfect analogy, but if my wife left me because I wan an alcoholic, and I came back seven years later saying “I’m sober now!”, you think she’s going to take me back or have moved on with her fucking life?
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 5 months ago
Yeah I have no idea what you’re trying to tell me. You’re not going to buy a Tesla because they lied about FSD a decade earlier? Ok. Good for you?
Aceticon@lemmy.world 5 months ago
As I explained somebody else the other day, software development follows a 90/10 rule in that 90% of the work are the last 10% of the result and these guys have been stuck for years at the “almost there” stage.
It’s perfectly possible to hack your way for the first easy 90% of the result but that software development “method” won’t get you up to the 99.999% levels of reliability (or whatever number of nines the regulations demand) needed for a FSD system to be certified as autonomous.
So no amount of people showing full self drive working without problems sometimes or even most of the time (or as you say, “practically”) will show that Testla has the capability of doing the last 10% (which, remember, as most of the work), whilst them having been stuck at pretty much the current level for years is a good indication that they’re probably stuck down a dead-end that will never lead to something that can achieve the necessary reliability to be certified as an autonomous system.
Also, in my professional opinion as a very senior software engineer, judging by many software and UI design choices in their vehicles, they’re unlikelly to actually be competent enough to pull it off and seem to be following a Tech Startup model (and I can tell you from experience in that Industry and others, that Startups are usually amateur hour, every hour of the day, every day of the week, every week of the year compared to all of the rest)
Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 months ago
Can’t wait to take a real life Johnnycab.
Exactly the same price as a normal taxi (if not higher, because there’s no competition left), but now all the money goes to needy Silicon Valley trillionaires, rather than some greedy low life taxi driver who just wants to waste that money on food and rent, rather than lovely sustaining growth.
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 5 months ago
That taxi might just aswell belong to a a private individual who instead of leaving their car at the company parking lot for the whole day sent it doing ridesharing.
zik@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Meanwhile Mercedes has already reached level 3.
Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 5 months ago
The link you didn’t open has a video comparing Tesla and Mercedes driving the exact same route on autopilot.