Comment on RE: https:// mastodon.social/@pomarede/1168 09987222569057 Surp
boud@framapiaf.org 2 weeks ago
@pomarede @TillSawala @cosmology
It's good that 'Science' magazine caught up and that Sylos Labini has acknowledged the error :).
However, the 'Science' text omits the fact that the #little_h error (a factor of about 1.4) counts for a lot more of the error (in this particular analysis) than the comoving-vs-luminosity-distance error (a factor of about 1.08 in the centre of the Sloan Great Wall).