I am a pilot and this is NOT how autopilot works.
There is some autoland capabilities in the larger commercial airliners, but autopilot can be as simple as a wing-leveler.
The waypoints must be programmed by the pilot in the GPS. Altitude is entirely controlled by the pilot, not the plane, except when on a programming instrument approach, and only when it captures the glideslope (so you need to be in the correct general area in 3d space for it to work).
An autopilot is actually a major hazard to the untrained pilot and has killed many, many untrained pilots as a result.
Whereas when I get in my Tesla, I use voice commands to say where I want to go and now-a-days, I don’t have to make interventions. Even when it was first released 6 years ago, it still did more than most aircraft autopilots.
abhibeckert@lemmy.world 6 months ago
This. But I think it’s better to use marine autopilot system as a comparison - aircraft autopilots are closely monitored by three people (two in the cockpit, one on the ground as air traffic control). Not really comparable to a car.
Autopilot in a boat traditionally just turns the steering wheel for you. And all it does is maintain a desired direction of travel. Not even a destination, just a direction. So if wind or currents blow you off course, it’s not going to account for that. It also doesn’t control speed.
There are more advanced systems, but that’s traditionally how autopilot works.
Having said that, Tesla hasn’t just used the word “autopilot”. They also repeatedly refer to their system as “Full Self Driving”. And it kinda does that, as long as there isn’t a fire truck in the way.
CodeInvasion@sh.itjust.works 6 months ago
Agreed.
Nevertheless, the Federal regulators will have an uphill battle as mentioned in the article.
The big thing they could get Tesla on is the safety record for autosteer. But again there would need to be proof it was known.