Comment on Glad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversity
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year agoBlacks and whites. Indians and Asians. Look, it’s plural. Add an S, guess it’s dehumanizing? I think the term daddy is dehumanizing. Please, only use dad. Do not add another dy.
pyff@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
Yes, generally referring to groups of people as pluralized adjectives is considered dehumanizing.
www.archives.gov/research/catalog/…/black-person
nabjonline.org/news-media-center/styleguide/#styl…
This is for the exact same reason you would not refer to a singular Black person as “a black”. If you still have trouble recognizing the issue, consider how jarring the term “a gay” would seem in print.
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I didn’t say “a black”, context matters no? Everyone thought saying Indian was offensive and came up with native American, until realizing that is more offensive? Just because it’s plural doesn’t make it dehumanizing. Black people says blacks, I don’t hear them say a group of black people.
pyff@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
Are you under the impression that race and nationality are equivalent? If you’re asking whether the term is considered dehumanizing, that’s been answered for you, and if you’re asking why, that’s been answered as well. In English, racial and ethnic terms are generally used as adjectives, and we don’t use adjectives as nouns when referring to groups of people.
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think what is dehumanizing is a matter of opinion