Comment on Glad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversity
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year agoYeah because the majority of blacks use reddit and ebony porn sites. So do you call them ebonies?
Comment on Glad to see Lemmy users appreciating diversity
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year agoYeah because the majority of blacks use reddit and ebony porn sites. So do you call them ebonies?
pyff@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
Not exactly sure what you’re asking, but no, collective nouns aren’t generally pluralized in English, nor is the term appropriate outside of a porn context. Are you a native English speaker?
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Blacks and whites. Indians and Asians. Look, it’s plural. Add an S, guess it’s dehumanizing? I think the term daddy is dehumanizing. Please, only use dad. Do not add another dy.
pyff@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
Yes, generally referring to groups of people as pluralized adjectives is considered dehumanizing.
www.archives.gov/research/catalog/…/black-person
nabjonline.org/news-media-center/styleguide/#styl…
This is for the exact same reason you would not refer to a singular Black person as “a black”. If you still have trouble recognizing the issue, consider how jarring the term “a gay” would seem in print.
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I didn’t say “a black”, context matters no? Everyone thought saying Indian was offensive and came up with native American, until realizing that is more offensive? Just because it’s plural doesn’t make it dehumanizing. Black people says blacks, I don’t hear them say a group of black people.
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Why is the term acceptable to porn, do they not use English?
pyff@lemmynsfw.com 1 year ago
It’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.
Stinkywinks@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Pfffffft, sounds like a load of bs. What about Brazilians?