Comment on xkcd #2929: Good and Bad Ideas

• eksb@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  This is expensive to address because you have to separate cyclists out to the right before the right car lane splits for right turns before the crossover. And then you have to build a bridge or tunnel for cyclists and pedestrians. On each side.

  Really, any road busy enough to justify a diverging diamond probably already needed separated bike lanes. But in America (motto: “If you aren’t in a car, you don’t matter”), there almost certainly was not any cycling infrastructure there before.

  There is one of these near me. Their solution for pedestrians is to make them cross the high speed outer lanes where drivers are encouraged to not slow down FOUR times. Their solution for cyclists is take the lane and pray or get off and do what the pedestrians have to do.

  source

  • Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    where drivers are encouraged to not slow down FOUR times

    Wtf, thats insane

    source

    • eksb@programming.dev ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      To be clear, it is four times that pedestrians have to cross, not four times that drivers are encouraged to not slow down. Drivers are not explicitly encouraged to not slow down, but the point of the diverging diamond is to make drivers not have to slow down.

      source

      • Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

        Ohhh, thanks for the clarification 😅

        source