Comment on Kagi silently removed all references to Google's index from their website
vanderbilt@lemmy.world 4 months agoHe offered to start a conversation about his blog post and give his perspective. The only thing I see here is the author refusing to stand on their post.
RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I didn’t read every little bit as well, but that was my take away as well. I saw an emotially invested CEO who could not bear seeing his baby dragged through the mud, and so he wanted to provide a counterpoint to what he saw as misinformation and accusations, but in a polite professional manner. My first instinct would be that he would have been wasting his time with that, but seeing as his comments got posted and they make a more convincing level headed argument then the accusations, maybe it was worth it.
Zengen@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I agree with this perspective. The CEO felt like the more reasonable guy here who wanted to respectfully and professionally clear his name through polite conversation. And the writer here seemed very aggressive. The line of questioning was outwardly hostile and accusatory with literally nothing for good evidence.