The article is overreaching a bit. They inokybthat because he advocates for free speech, that he shiukdnt have the same protections under the law. Does that mean if someone advocates for non death penalty, that it shouldn’t apply in their case? Or is it only the case when it suits a narrative.

Poor reporting over what seems to be a minor incident. They have the right to private enjoyment of their home. She has the right to protest.