Of course ad-supported services are infringing on your privacy in a way but if you’re not ready to call Facebook a publicly-funded utility, it’s childish to act like it’s so essential that it should be entirely ad-free with no paid tier.
You are presenting a false dichotomy and ads do not have to infringe in your privacy to the degree Facebook does it. You’re reducing these arguments so much they’re losing the nuance that warrants the entire discussion. You’re also calling me childish to boot, which doesn’t give me much hope for the rest of this conversation
garrett@infosec.pub 8 months ago
Of course ad-supported services are infringing on your privacy in a way but if you’re not ready to call Facebook a publicly-funded utility, it’s childish to act like it’s so essential that it should be entirely ad-free with no paid tier.
BolexForSoup@kbin.social 8 months ago
You are presenting a false dichotomy and ads do not have to infringe in your privacy to the degree Facebook does it. You’re reducing these arguments so much they’re losing the nuance that warrants the entire discussion. You’re also calling me childish to boot, which doesn’t give me much hope for the rest of this conversation
garrett@infosec.pub 8 months ago
That is a valid, nuanced take that this article and (seemingly) the legislation don’t get into.
BolexForSoup@kbin.social 8 months ago
Th first sentence of the article establishes my argument.