jet@hackertalks.com 1 year ago
Name lookups. Like DNS.
If you have a trusted Oracle on whatever chain you’re using, then your smart contracts can start working with real world data. And that opens up lots of possibilities. Of course it puts a lot of faith in oracles. But for instance you could have an inheritance scheme that triggers on the death of a relative. You could do life insurance. You could affect any sort of contract was transaction money or currency.
To your points about central control, I think it’s anthema to the idea of a distributed system. If your resistant to malicious actors you have to be resistant to censorship. Because it’s only a matter of time until the central authority becomes a malicious actor. At least for some of the population.
TCB13@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Trust is a fundamental thing in human life an society. It get around the abuses by having checks designed into the system and smart ways to stop corruption.
jet@hackertalks.com 1 year ago
You can make the same argument against escrow services. But they’re absolutely fundamental to housing transactions. Where the risk of a downside is unacceptable.
TCB13@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I can, and I do and that’s exactly the point. An escrow service from the environmental standpoint is way more efficient than any smart contract based solution.