What does the monetization scheme have to do with it?
Comment on EU tells Meta it can't paywall privacy
garrett@infosec.pub 7 months agoBut there’s also no ad-supported cars.
BolexForSoup@kbin.social 7 months ago
garrett@infosec.pub 6 months ago
The point was that it’s apples to oranges. Monetization is kinda the key issue here unless you’re ready to declare Facebook a utility and publicly fund it. Personally, I’d rather we be rid of it entirely.
BolexForSoup@kbin.social 6 months ago
beyond how it infringes on them
garrett@infosec.pub 6 months ago
Of course ad-supported services are infringing on your privacy in a way but if you’re not ready to call Facebook a publicly-funded utility, it’s childish to act like it’s so essential that it should be entirely ad-free with no paid tier.
520@kbin.social 6 months ago
Yet.
garrett@infosec.pub 6 months ago
Only cause they can’t interject ads while driving lol
520@kbin.social 6 months ago
They'll try, I'm sure. Tesla and law abiding don't go well together.
DrWeevilJammer@lemmy.ml 7 months ago
Not seeing ads for GEICO on your car’s dashboard doesn’t mean that Toyota isn’t gathering as much data as they can about you via the platform they built and then selling that information to GEICO.
Source
garrett@infosec.pub 6 months ago
And that is totally unreasonable collection, of course. It’s also completely incomparable to pretending that Facebook is as necessary as a car (at least in America).
BolexForSoup@kbin.social 6 months ago
If your bar is “we only have rights when it comes to things that we can’t live without“ then not only are you creating your own arbitrary standards that is not reflected in our society, but you should be angry if you think that’s how things work.
You have rights dude. Stop trying to win an online argument/defending businesses. There are limits.