Comment

Comment on Eight tips about consent for fediverse developers

ericjmorey@discuss.online ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Consent isn’t really built into ActivityPub and it’s inherently the opposite of how I understand it to work (copying your content all over the place regardless of your desires).

ActivityPub is a means of sharing information in a way that the information can easily be collected and reshared. By using it, you should expect that people will collect and reshare information you send via the ActivityPub protocol.

source

Sort:hotnew top

GlitterInfection@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
The article addresses this directly in the section on things to not say, though:

ActivityPub does indeed “makes assumptions that are fundamentally opposed to the kinds of protections that people seem to be seeking.” But in a discussion about whether or not to get consent, even the ones that are true the miss the point – just because ActivityPub leaves open possibilities for you to do something without getting consent, that’s not the only option.

source
- ericjmorey@discuss.online ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  That addressing is insufficient because it begs the question of consent being withheld. But the consent is implicitly given by the sending of information via the protocol, otherwise a service like Mastodon can’t exist. The question of asking for consent after it is given is the part that I’m conflicted about.
  
  source
  - GlitterInfection@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Read the article, I didn’t write it.
    
    source
    ericjmorey@discuss.online ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    I did. I’m sharing my thoughts about it. Some of those thoughts are that it seems to make assumptions that don’t hold.
    
    source
    -> View More Comments