Comment on From the GOG newsletter: "A note about your GOG Patrons subscription"
guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 5 days agoThen… can you share that source with us? I won’t just believe you unless you can give me evidence
Comment on From the GOG newsletter: "A note about your GOG Patrons subscription"
guynamedzero@piefed.zeromedia.vip 5 days agoThen… can you share that source with us? I won’t just believe you unless you can give me evidence
elvith@feddit.org 5 days ago
They basically used runes in a newsletter for a promotion of a game that “rendered unfavorably on some devices”. Whether it’s a QA error or if it was intentional with “plausible deniability” was debated everywhere a few weeks ago.
heise.de/…/GOG-apologizes-for-newsletter-with-SS-…
Mac@mander.xyz 5 days ago
And not only that, but they said “Hey, Germans will probably he sensitive to these so we’ll ship these to everyone but them”.
pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 5 days ago
It’s probably not about sensitivity(people outside of Germany are actually more sensitive to that for obvious reasons) but because it’s illegal in Germany.
HereIAm@lemmy.world 5 days ago
Sure, but the issue remains the same; they absolutely knew what those symbols would be interpreted as, and still went aged with it.
Mac@mander.xyz 5 days ago
The illegality is the sensitivity.
maus@sh.itjust.works 5 days ago
German team flagged it, but did not communicate it in time to the other teams.
abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 5 days ago
The game being advertised talks about how Nazis adopted ancient symbols that previously had nothing to do with Nazis. A problem to have the double lightning bolts there but it’s a bit of a stretch to say it’s some kind of “tee hee we’re actually Nazis” dog whistle bs.