Comment on Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works
Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 months agoWhen it generates additional data instead of just interpolating captured data
Comment on Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works
Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 months agoWhen it generates additional data instead of just interpolating captured data
fuzzzerd@programming.dev 7 months ago
What would you classify google or apple portrait mode as? It’s definitely doing something. We can probably agree, at this point it’s still a reasonably enhanced version of what was really there, but maybe a Snapchat filter that turns you into a dog is obviously too much. The question is where in that spectrum is the AI or algorithm too much?
Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 months ago
It varies, there’s definitely generative pieces involved but they try to not make it blatant
If we’re talking evidence in court then it’s practically speaking more important if the photographer themselves can testify about how accurate they think it is and how well it corresponds to what they saw. Any significantly AI edited photo effectively becomes as strong evidence as a diary entry written by a person on the scene, it backs up their testimony to a certain degree by checking for the witness’ consistency over time instead of trusting it directly.