Comment on What's your take on Bluesky?

• shaked_coffee@feddit.it ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  She was saying that on Mastodon (that was the main activitypub platform she was comparing to) the choice of the instance can heavily influence your experience. If I don’t remember wrong her main points were:

  • There’s a local timeline and a federated timeline, and even in the federated timeline you see your instance posts and the posts of the instances yours have federated with, not all posts
  • A global search is not always the easiest thing to do, and previous attempts of project that would have facilitated it didn’t received much appreciation from the community
  • If your instance admin do choices you don’t agree with (for example blocking another instance) the only way to interact with that other instance is to move yourself
  • Moving from an instance to another means loosing your posts and replies, that would stay on the original instance

  She was not saying that this approach is wrong, in fact many people on Mastodon like this more community-focused and less-global approach, just that it isn’t what they wanted for Bluesky

  source

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Personally it basically sounds like decentralization (instance-focused) vs centralization (Blueskys approach).

    The fact that individual instances are in control of their user’s experience is a feature of ActivityPub, not a big. And it is exactly important for users to choose instances that align with their views - this makes the Fediverse democratic in a natural fashion. Or at least, it makes sure people get the experience they want, not the experience the global centralised entity wants the user to have.

    I definitely prefer and trust decentralization a lot more.

    source