Back when I built racks, our “standard” was UPS at the bottom, all drives at the top…but mainly for accessibility. Hadn’t even thought about vibrations or interference!
Comment on Finally got a UPS
nezbyte@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Great setup! I’ve heard that it is best practice to keep a little distance between servers/drives and the UPS just to be safe from vibrations or EMI. Does anyone know if this is still something to worry about?
glimse@lemmy.world 3 months ago
poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 months ago
Ups at the bottom is also because of the weight of the batteries. In a small rack like this I don’t think moving the disks 30cm up will make a big difference.
glimse@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Absolutely on that point. Same goes for heavy multi zone amplifiers.
Man I loved building racks. Almost makes me miss field work…
catloaf@lemm.ee 3 months ago
Drives at the top? Hell no. SANs are heavy, they go in the bottom half too (assuming a mixed rack). Especially if you have those disk shelves that slide out so they hold 3.5" drives three deep. Top of the rack is for network hardware and such.
glimse@lemmy.world 3 months ago
I did not install SANs, I built racks for AV so the only drives were NAS/mini PCs on shelves
Prizephitah@feddit.nu 3 months ago
If there were ones that vibrated or had interference enough to affect neighboring units, that would be marketing points. As it is now, no one mentions any of those points. It’s all capacity, I/O and features.
If there were units that showed any of those issues, the reviews would tell.
This unit is basically dead silent in normal operation. During charging and discharging there is an audible hum, but nothing else. I haven’t noticed any vibration or ZFS scrubs reporting corrections.
tal@lemmy.today 3 months ago
What in your UPS is vibrating? You mean the fans?
nezbyte@lemmy.world 3 months ago
no clue, mine doesn’t seem to vibrate. just one of the things that popped up when I searched for why they used to warn against it. was hoping to get a “back in my day” comment explaining why.