Those weren’t evidence based treatments to begin with. When we got evidence we stopped using them.
Puberty blockers already have evidence. They’ve been used since the 80s.
Comment on Trans youth will no longer be prescribed puberty blockers, NHS England says
Wanderer@lemm.ee 8 months agoDoctors used to regularly treat patients with mercury and blood letting. Then more data came out to say it was bad so they stopped doing it. That’s how medicine works.
Lmaydev@programming.dev 7 months ago
BolexForSoup@kbin.social 7 months ago
We still do bloodletting. They have medical leeches.
Wanderer@lemm.ee 7 months ago
But they don’t do it for everything because things they did use it for they found out were bad, just like puberty blockers.
BolexForSoup@kbin.social 7 months ago
It was a dumb comparison and as others have pointed out, giving people mercury was not evidence-based treatment. Comparing half a century of data using quality methods and testing to mercury chugging centuries ago is profoundly ignorant.
Wanderer@lemm.ee 7 months ago
The evidence is not there for puberty blockers and it isn’t there for mercury.
Either way the medical professionals have worked out what is best for the patient based on all the information and they have decided no to puberty blockers. No point talking about it anymore, the experts have spoken and neither of us has more data than them.
ondoyant@beehaw.org 7 months ago
no, it wasn’t “more data”, it was just data. blood letting and mercury are pre-scientific treatments that were in use during the 1600s. puberty blockers were developed with a modern understanding of hormones, and extensively tested before they saw use in a clinical setting. you might as well have brought up magic as a legitimate medical practice that we eventually proved wrong. like, no duh, but it also has basically no bearing on the safety of a chemically synthesized hormone inhibitor invented in the 20th century.