Comment

Comment on The playground schematic analogy for designing a fediverse service.

Rentlar@lemmy.ca ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

I’m not sure why Beehaw is coming up specifically in recent day (did something happen that I missed?), but their moderation issues and needs came up as early as June and July of last year, but was definitely being talked about by September between Beehaw admins and users. Here’s the thread I remember on it.

Another thread on one of the major CSAM content attack events against Lemmy (the one that took out vlemmy.net if you’re a Fedilore historian) highlighted their desire for a better platform.

I’m OOTL if anything specific happened between the Lemmy devs and Beehaw admins this week that caused more beef, but the mindset that the development of much needed moderation features was progressing too slowly was with the Beehaw admins for many months now.

source

Sort:hotnew top

Blaze@dormi.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
docs.beehaw.org/…/beehaw-lemmy-and-a-vision-of-th…

source
- Rentlar@lemmy.ca ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Thank you for the link! I can see yeah it appears like drama on the face of it, but from I see it’s nutomic continuing to be defensive (as far as I’m concerned it’s their right to be) and the write up is a mere extension of the uneasiness expressed last fall, just adds up to mean that Beehaw and Lemmy’s goals still haven’t fully aligned in the last 6 months.
  
  I’ve donated to the Beehaw project because I support their vision, if they separate entirely from Lemmy on a new service I’ll be happy for them for it, but I will stay on Lemmy.
  
  source
  - Blaze@dormi.zone ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    
    Thank you for the link!
    
    You are welcome!
    
    it all just adds up to mean that Beehaw and Lemmy’s goals still haven’t fully aligned in the last 6 months.
    
    Yes indeed
    
    source