So we’re censoring political speech?
Comment on US lawmakers vote 50-0 to force sale of TikTok despite angry calls from users
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 months agoIt’s not about data harvesting, it’s about targeting users with political ideas. If you watch a video for a certain amount of time then they will continue showing you those types of videos. There’s tons of bad faith political targeting on TikTok just like every other platform. The issue is that it’s difficult to avoid because the platform decides what you look at unlike other platforms.
BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 3 months ago
PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 3 months ago
Foreign adversaries don’t have 1st amendment rights.
furikuri@programming.dev 3 months ago
This is why I’m having trouble understanding why people are confused about the bill’s purpose, especially in the context of the last dozen years or so. Allowing a political rival to maintain control over a platform like this is granting them soft power. Even if I agree that companies like Meta should be more heavily regulated (though not in this manner), I can see why they’ve put a bandaid on the issue given that there’s a non-zero chance that TikTok’s content has been actively in the past few years