Comment

Comment on Sweeping EU rules for tech giants take effect today. Here’s what’s changing | CNN Business

A nice as it would be to have, I don’t get how the messaging interoperability is going to work in practice. The different platforms have many technical differences between them at the backend, and also mismatched user facing feature sets. Ironing all of the that out into some sort of common ground is going to be difficult, especially without it being very janky.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this is kicked into the long grass eventually.

source

Sort:hotnew top

DandomRude@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
It would certainly be a technical challenge. But I think the utility would be very high. In my experience, it’s difficult to convince people to use an app like Signal if they can’t use it to communicate with their Whatsapp contacts (etc.).

source
- Redex68@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  It would probably just use RCS as the backend and have some different functionalities, they could easily just highlight “this person isn’t using Signal so chat features are limited”. Hell, Signal had exactly this when they made the app work as an alternative SMS client. They removed that feature, but it existed previously.
  
  source
lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
They all have the capability to support a UI where you type a message, hit send, and the message is delivered. This proves it’s possible to make and support an interface that hides all the backend complexity. If they don’t expose the same functionality through an API, it’s because they don’t want to, not because it’s too hard.

I’m sure there will be some features that aren’t fully supported across messaging platforms, but for basic use cases like sending a text or an image, there’s really no excuse.

source
Redex68@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
It would probably just use RCS as the backend and have some different functionalities, they could easily just highlight “this person isn’t using Signal so chat features are limited”. Hell, Signal had exactly this when they made the app work as an alternative SMS client. They removed that feature, but it existed previously.

source
- lolcatnip@reddthat.com ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Nah, fuck RCS. There is no reason for a mobile carrier to be involved in anything besides voice calls and TCP/IP traffic. Any protocol that requires participation from carriers beyond delivering TCP/IP packets is broken by design. It’s like designing a water faucet that somehow can’t work without active cooperation from your local water company.
  
  source
  - smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Voice is also debatable.
    
    VoLTE is such a mess. It requires OS, modem and phone operator to all work together, where I heard none of them is often to the spec. As of now voice calling should be a simple Internet based app, maybe with autoconfiguration to not break “inset SIM and done” habits.
    
    source
maynarkh@feddit.nl ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Ironing all of the that out into some sort of common ground is going to be difficult

The big platform has to develop an open API to implement standard message, image and video traffic. No need for a common standard, as long as everyone can implement the eg. open Whatsapp API.

source
Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com ⁨8⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
The same way as users have set up a bridge between Matrix and discord.

source