Comment on Is they're an easy way to make my Jellyfin accessible outside of my home network
FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 day agoI’ve set it up next to my NPM and it’s more complicated, but so much more capable. Traefik is what it uses to proxy things. You’re comparing a full suite of tools with just one piece.
I mean, that’s debatable. Taking a look at their
docker-compose.ymlthere are 3 containers they recommend running, with a 4 optional container.To say this is a “full-suite” is a bit much when majority of the heavy lifting is done by Traefik, the middleware’s you assign to Traefik and WireGuard. Pangolin if I’m reading this correctly;
Which is great! However as I mentioned previously, does not integrate well when these services are already setup to work standalone.
FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Pangolin uses gerbil with newt for those wireguard tunnels. That’s a massive improvement already. It also adds a bunch more features like vpn, you can crowdsec, and more that I don’t use. To say it’s debatable if it’s a suite of tools is just wrong.
How is it wrong to say it is debatable when Traefik and WireGuard have quite literally done majority of the development. Pangolin is just a man in the middle.
According to the Newt ReadMe -
Seems to me that WireGuard is their primary dependency, without WireGuard what use is it?
According to Pangolin docs they rely on the Crowdsec middleware offered by Traefik.
FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 hours ago
Do you not understand what a suite of tools is? It’s a curated collection of tools that have been chosen to work together. You’re describing the reasons why Pangolin is in fact a full suite. You’re right, Pangolin is the bit that orchestrates them and brings them together with an easier way to manage them. That’s what a suite of tools does.