Comment on Are there any genuine benefits to AI?

• boatswain@infosec.pub ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You’re confusing brainstorming with content generation. LLMs are great for brainstorming: they can quickly churn out dozens of ideas for my D&D campaign, which I then look through, discard the garbage, keep the good bits of, and riff off of before incorporating into my campaign. If I just used everything it suggested blindly, yeah, nightmare fuel. For brainstorming though, it’s fantastic.

  source

  • Silentiea@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Exactly. It can generate those base-level ideas much faster and worth higher fidelity than humans can without it, and that can see us at the hobby level with DND, or up at the business level with writers rooms and such.

    The important point is that you still need someone good at making the thing you want to look at and finish the thing you’re making, or you end up with paintings with too many fingers or stories full of contradictions

    source

    • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Any kid who uses it to craft their campaign is lazy and depriving themselves of a valuable experience, any professional who uses it to write a book, script, or study is wildly unethical, and both are creating a much much worse product than a human without reliance on them. That is the reality of a model who at 100% accuracy would be exactly as flawed as human output, and we’re nowhere near that accuracy.

      source

      • Silentiea@lemm.ee ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        But the point is that you don’t use it to make the campaign or write the book. You use it as a tool to help yourself make a campaign or write a book. Ignoring the potential of ai as a tool is silly just because it can’t do the whole job for you. That would be a bit like saying you are a fool for using a sponge when washing because it will never get everything by itself…

        source

        • -> View More Comments
  • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I would retort that the exact opposite is true, that content generation is the only thing LLMs are good at because they often forget the context of their previous statements.

    source

    • boatswain@infosec.pub ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I think we’re saying the same thing there: LLMs are great at spewing out a ton of content, which makes them a great tool for brainstorming. The content they create is not necessarily trustworthy or even good, but it can be great fuel for the creative process.

      source

      • doctorcrimson@lemmy.today ⁨4⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        My stance is that spewing out a ton of content is not conducive to creative good content. That hasn’t changed.

        source