Like I don’t know much about chemistry but like that chemical doesn’t look happy , wouldn’t be surprised if its explosive
Comment on Indeed it is.
kbal@kbin.melroy.org 11 months ago
Isn't HgU also pretty toxic though?
MinekPo1@lemmygrad.ml 11 months ago
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 months ago
I don’t think that’s a possible compound. My chemistry knowledge is very rusty but I can recall ever hearing about a chemical bond between two metals.
kbal@kbin.melroy.org 11 months ago
https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.L060412
Let it never be said that I don't back up my silly Internet comments with sufficient research.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 months ago
Fascinating.
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
That’s what alloys are. Brass, bronze, pewter, etc. Alloys containing mercury get the special name “amalgam”, for some reason.
lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 months ago
Does that mean that a piece of metal is essentially one giant molecule?
Sal@mander.xyz 11 months ago
Essentially, yes.
Whether the term “molecule” technically includes or excludes a piece of metal is a bit more tricky. I lean towards “no” more than “yes” because there are some important differences between what we generally call a “molecule” and how we think about a glassy or a crystalline solid. But I think both positions are arguable. If we are not being pedantic, then essentially yeah.
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
Kind of. Metallic bonding is a bit different from covalent bonding in that the electrons are delocalized over the entire material rather than trapped between specific atoms. The atoms are still held to each other by overlapping electron clouds though, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 months ago
cesium auride?
threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
CsAu? AuCs? I must be missing something…
anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 months ago
it’s an ionic compound.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesium_auride