Sure, but 60 years ago they coined “machine learning” when it became clear that there was going to be more work needed to emulate intelligence
Sure, but 60 years ago they coined “machine learning” when it became clear that there was going to be more work needed to emulate intelligence
General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 months ago
That’s wrong. Machine learning is considered part of AI. AI is not necessarily about learning. EG game AI typically doesn’t learn/improve.
Feel free to define intelligence and/or emulated intelligence.
match@pawb.social 4 months ago
We’re probably talking at crosspoints here. When people say not real AI, they usually mean not artificial general intelligence, or in many cases, not intelligent in the ways suited to the problem being addressed (e.g. ChatGPT being used out of the box as a customer service rep)
General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 months ago
As you said, it’s nice when words have meanings.
People who say it’s not real AI simply don’t know what the word has meant for decades. I think people want to say that it is not an actual person or something like that. Which, of course, it isn’t. I have to say, with 8 billion people on the planet, making artificial people would be the greatest waste of human effort I can imagine.