Comment

How concerned should I be?

What are the unspecified policies the developer claims that the company has failed to uphold? Who is this particular developer, and how much should I trust them? (I don’t follow nginx development at all.)

I celebrate the fact that open source licenses exist specifically to allow people to make a fork like this when they have disagreements! But I don’t know enough about this particular case to decide how it should affect my own plans.

source

Sort:hotnew top

canpolat@programming.dev ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Who is this particular developer

As far as I understand from the discussions about the topic, Maxim Dounin was one of the few core developers of nginx. Looks like Wikipedia has already been updated.

source
Corngood@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
freenginx.org/pipermail/nginx/…/000007.html

The most recent “security advisory” was released despite the fact that the particular bug in the experimental HTTP/3 code is expected to be fixed as a normal bug as per the existing security policy, and all the developers, including me, agree on this.

And, while the particular action isn’t exactly very bad, the approach in general is quite problematic.

I read something about this the other day, but I’m having trouble wrapping my head around it.

cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-2… my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000138444 …nginx.org/…/NW6MNW34VZ6HDIHH5YFBIJYZJN7FGNAV.htm…

This seems to have the best discussion I’ve found:

news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39373612

source
- mcherm@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Thank you.
  
  source
christophski@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
youtu.be/1pgLaV0o0AE?si=Z9Pelnv8onp-rtAy

source
- PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
  Try using words?
  
  source
  - christophski@feddit.uk ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago
    Wow you’re fun
    
    source