If you’re already using a VM anyway (especially for the backend/web UI piece) restoring the image won’t be any different for a server running docker vs one running apt packages.
If you’re already using a VM anyway (especially for the backend/web UI piece) restoring the image won’t be any different for a server running docker vs one running apt packages.
anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 7 months ago
True, I could use VM+Docker as you say. I’ve been thinking of making a dedicated “Docker VM” before when I’ve looked at interesting projects that has no other offerings.
I’ve felt that using docker in a vm robs docker of it’s advantages so why use it at all if I’m planning on having a vm? I guess one answer is “because the software you want is delivered as a docker image”.
AbidanYre@lemmy.world 7 months ago
It may seem like unnecessary overhead, but dockerized vaultwarden in a VM has been a huge improvement for me compared to unix-pass.
And with the volumes set up right, moving it is as easy as copy/pasting the folder it all lives in.
anamethatisnt@lemmy.world 7 months ago
Would work if it was planned to be a system used by only techies or if we knew exactly what groups are wanted beforehand. Definitely gonna remember the tip, splitting it into several shared dbs didn’t even hit me as an option.