Damn straight!
toasteecup@lemmy.world 8 months ago
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Blamemeta@lemm.ee 8 months ago
toasteecup@lemmy.world 8 months ago
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Damn straight!
PizzaMane@lemm.ee 8 months ago
“‘No Way to Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens”
toasteecup@lemmy.world 8 months ago
The funny thing is, as far as I read it, people shouldn’t be allowed fire arms unless they are a part of a militia which those got depreciated by having a centralized army.
PizzaMane@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Yeah. The whole point of the constitution was to change it over time to suit the needs of the people. And a policy/interpretation of “no gun restrictions are allowed ever until the end of time” is such a horrendous one.
It’s long past time it’s seen a revision.
Blamemeta@lemm.ee 8 months ago
Then try it. Fucking try it, and prove every one right.
MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works 8 months ago
Do you support the people’s right to form a militia then?
toasteecup@lemmy.world 8 months ago
I’m not opposed to it. I don’t think it has any value given the superiority of the military but hey constitution allows it. Mind you there are some caveats like said militia being used to break laws or conduct insurrection