They’ve been doing the things you’re talking about since the early 2000s, surely they’ve progresses more than that. I remember them saying that they can actually do the art you see in your head like 5 years ago.
Comment on Brain-computer interface easily slips in and out of ear canal
Caboose12000@lemmy.world 11 months agoI think when they say the scientists envision being able to convert full thoughts to text, that’s more like people 100 years ago saying they envision us having flying cars today. were no where near either of those things. BCI’s are mostly used for people with disabilities so they can convert a very simple brain signal like try to move arm into a very simple command like move wheelchair forward it’s still currently extremely impossible to decipher more complex ideas like an inner monolog, it isn’t handled by just turning off or on a single brain region the way movement is.
so I think you have nothing to worry about for this ultimate truth detector thing. not something that would be developed in our lifetime or even our grandkids lifetime imo
PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Caboose12000@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I’m not trying to be pedantic cause I’d actually kinda love to be wrong here, do you think you could find your source for that art thing? I’d love to read more about it, my understanding was that progress in this field was slow compared to the scales we’re talking about here
PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 11 months ago
On the games, they’re on the market now and being sold: scientificamerican.com/…/pogue-6-electronic-devic…
On the art, a puff piece with solid studies behind it: psychologytoday.com/…/new-brain-computer-interfac…
An_Ugly_Bastard@lemmy.world 11 months ago
We have flying cars. They’re called helicopters.  Also another reason we don’t have “flying cars” is that if your engine breaks down you die.
PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Also, can you imagine the quality of drivers that are currently on the road, in the air? How do you control the traffic?