Comment on Bluesky, a trendy rival to X, finally opens to the public

makeasnek@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

• 9point6@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  ActivityPub is a w3c standard, which IMO is a big plus over nostr which doesn’t have an established independent steward for it.

  Also isn’t there the thing where users can’t really be banned on nostr? I’m not sure where I read that, but that’s going to kill any mass adoption if that’s the case.

  source

  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    • You don’t need a w3c standard to have a protocol that is open source and used globally, it’s just one way to go about that. You can also have standards which are not made through w3c but are made through some other governance body, or you can have standards where the standard just kind of evolves from a bunch of different devs trying different versions of things until there’s one main way which floats to the top since everybody prefers it.
    • Relays on nostr, which are the equivalent to instances in ActivityPub/mastodon/lemmy can set their own moderation policies, defederate from other relays, etc all the same as in ActivityPub. The moderation abilities are basically the same. This means relays can choose what content they allow and ban users/topics/etc. The key difference is that you are by default connected to multiple relays. So if your relay blocks a user you really want to follow, you can keep following that user and see them in your feed, they just don’t show up for other users on that relay. So you get the best of both worlds: relays have curated, moderated public squares while not reducing your ability to choose who to follow and who can follow you.

    source

    • 9point6@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I see what you’re saying about it not needing a standards body, and of course that can work fine, but for me it’s an advantage that AP is maintained by a body independent from any specific implementation. An equivalent would be if the AP spec was defined by the Mastodon devs and community—not a bad thing, just not as good in my mind.

      The relays thing I think was what the unable to really ban comes from. Are there moderation tools to propagate bans across relays quickly? Some users need to be booted off the network entirely and swiftly sometimes, we’ve seen several cases of this in Lemmy already with users posting horrendous shit. I’d be concerned that one of my relays would lag on banning (timezone differences for moderators or whatever innocuous reason) and these users achieve their goal of people seeing the shit they post. For some people this might trigger PTSD, which is why I say it would be a huge barrier to mass adoption until that issue is resolved.

      The user portability aspect is the main advantage of it that I can see, and it looks like a pretty clever solution to the issue. Though personally speaking, I only really care about my subscription list, which I sync between two accounts already using my lemmy client. I understand some people might care more about the other stuff though (particularly on microblog platforms)

      source

      • makeasnek@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Before we get into the weeds here, let’s start with an important basis premise: Moderation ability, at a protocol level, from an instance/relay admin perspective in nostr and AP is identical.

        Are there moderation tools to propagate bans across relays quickly?

        Relay operators can share ban lists like they do in AP. Relay operators can only directly control their own relay, not other relays.

        Some users need to be booted off the network entirely and swiftly sometimes, we’ve seen several cases of this in Lemmy already with users posting horrendous shit. I’d be concerned that one of my relays would lag on banning (timezone differences for moderators or whatever innocuous reason) and these users achieve their goal of more people seeing the shit they post. For some people this might trigger PTSD, which is why I say it would be a huge barrier to mass adoption until that issue is resolved.

        Relays sharing ban lists help can solve this problem. I would argue that we don’t want to give that power (to ban a user from the entire network) to a single relay admin or even a couple relay admins (since anybody can be a relay admin), so broad consensus of some form needs to exist. A relay admin doesn’t need to be able to ban somebody from the entire network if they simply disagree with that user’s post, they can just ban the user on their own relay. There is value in having public squares with varying degrees of moderation, among other reasons, because laws about what kind of speech are acceptable vary country by country. There is value in having mainstream platforms which refuse to host some kinds of content and having that be a different moderation policy than the one used by the government, for example. Remember that legality and morality are not the same and that there are differences in what is illegal vs illegal in different jurisdictions.

        If the user is doing something which is very illegal, which I believe you are referring to, that is a job for law enforcement. Neutral networks like the internet are traditionally policed “at the edges”. We don’t have gmail proactively filtering for objectionable or illegal content because of the consequences that come from that privacy invasion, false positives, additional computational load, reducing reliability of sending/receive between email carriers, etc. Comcast is not inspecting packets as they fly through their network at a the speed of light, delaying them, and determining if they should be passed or not. It’s the internet, they just pass them through. Instead, we say “this is an open, neutral network and if you break the law, LEO will deal with it”.

        source

        • -> View More Comments
• banghida@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  Isn’t nostr something something Bitcoin?

  source

  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    It has an optional built-in tipping function where you can tip users (and receive tips) if you like their posts. Just like reddit had. Pretty cool imo but not required to use the platform.

    source

    • banghida@lemm.ee ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      It is still rather cringe it is joined with Bitcoin at the hip, it even uses secpk1.

      source

      • makeasnek@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        If you want a platform with built-in tipping, you can’t use PayPal, the fees make microtransactions impossible. If you don’t like the Bitcoin feature, you don’t have to use it. Bitcoin has a market cap that puts it in the top 25 countries by GDP. Higher than Sweden. It’s been doing its thing for 15 years. People may say they don’t like it, but if you decide to not use any platform or service which accepts or uses Bitcoin, your circle of places you can use is going to continue to get smaller. Have fun not shopping at Safeway or any other major grocery store since they all have Bitcoin ATMs. Have fun not using mutual funds or other investment portfolios from major banks since they all have degree of exposure to Bitcoin. You choice to avoid it is yours alone, but it seems like a weird thing to be mad about and hate.

        Crypto is full of scams and rug pulls and bad actors. But Bitcoin has kept its promises to faithfully relay transactions without a single hack or day of downtime for 15 years. They are not the same.

        source
• Asudox@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  I’d just like to inerject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Nostr, is in fact one of the clients using Nostr as its protocol to communicate with other platforms using the Nostr protocol. You see, ‘Nostr’ is just the protocol. But when you add the wide range of available clients, it becomes a fully functional fediverse. So, it’s more fittingly dubbed clients powered by Nostr!

  source

  • bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    i also would like to interject and say i don't trust anyone involved with the development or promotion of nostr.

    source
  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Yes very true!

    source