Comment on Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin
Sanyanov@lemmy.world 7 months agoPeople had 15 years to “wake up” now, yet they didn’t. Partly due to volatility which makes planning near economic future impossible, but most importantly because they still get their wages in fiat, pay for products in fiat etc.
The state doesn’t have incentive to change the regulations that favor crypto because crypto is generally worse as actual money as opposed to store of value for the reasons described above.
Crypto bros will shill “crypto everywhere soon” narrative every time they can, and I’ve seen it since at least Mt. Gox era. But until the regulations will be there (and they won’t), nothing is gonna happen.
TypicalHog@lemm.ee 7 months ago
I appreciate your opinion. But why do you think FIAT will survive and how?
Sanyanov@lemmy.world 7 months ago
I’ve kinda answered it already - because most governments will keep it alive by never ever going crypto. After all, this will probably be in the best interest of the general public as well, and it doesn’t appear that concepts of going full crypto are popular among masses.
TypicalHog@lemm.ee 7 months ago
I don’t think you understand my question. I’m not asking why governments will or will not ditch FIAT for crypto.
I’m asking you what makes you think FIAT will survive and not hyperinflate. And if you think so, why? Like, what will prevent USD let’s say from bleeding out in terms of value, or even dying suddenly (by suddenly I mean hyperinflation that kills it in years time after it begins).
Sanyanov@lemmy.world 7 months ago
That’s a job of central banks, and they normally manage it well enough. Sure, crypto offers more reliability on that front by making it impossible to control emission. But at the same time, this means money can’t be printed when it would be highly beneficial for the economy, for example when recovering from economic crisis. At the end of the day, the fiat emission is agile for good reasons.