Comment on Browser maker love-in snubs Google-shunned JPEG XL

<- View Parent
RayJW@sh.itjust.works ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

Well yes, however without acceleration JPEG XL is many times faster. Also if you only have a CPU for example.

It’s also highly parallelizable compared to AVIF which also matters a lot considering the amount of cores is growing with the likes of ARM and hybrid architecture CPU.

AVIF also fairs badly with high fidelity and lossless encoding, has 1/3 bit depth and pretty small dimension limits for something like photography oriented cameras.

I don’t think AVIF is per se a bad format. I just think if I want to replace a photo oriented format I’d like to do that with one that’s focused on „good“ photos and not just an afterthought with up- and downsides.

source
Sort:hotnewtop