That’s a good point a lot of the crypto markets influence is still more focused as an investment vehicle for getting more fiat wealth, that’s more reasonable to me. I guess I am just a die hard engineer and the practical uses matters a lot more than the price of tulips.
Comment on Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin
linearchaos@lemmy.world 4 months agoI’m not an economist or anything, but I don’t think it’s a sunk cost fallacy I think it’s just a market. They’re all mining both. Just leaning heavier on whichever one makes them more money in the moment. The market is going to have a hell of a lot of inertia.
fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 4 months ago
linearchaos@lemmy.world 4 months ago
I mean honestly you’re right. Nobody should be left on the Bitcoin side from an environmental or a cost standpoint. But I have no idea how long it’s going to take to catch up.
I will say that at some point if there is an awakening, bitcoin’s going to crash so f****** hard. And the first ones out are going to make all the money.
sukhmel@programming.dev 4 months ago
The market is run by people, and people have been proven not to be rational. So, sunk cost easily applies to the market
linearchaos@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Come on, that’s logic 101
All a are b
some b are c
all a are not c.
You can’t even claim that most A are C with that logic
sukhmel@programming.dev 4 months ago
I can’t quite follow you beyond the fact that in your example “all A are not C” is correct
linearchaos@lemmy.world 4 months ago
Yeah I think that’s our major problem here.