Comment on Fighting with immich

• bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  All the traffic is internal, so I can get away with it 🙃

  Really was just interested in what cert generation entailed and did a fun little dive a few years back.

  source

  • conrad82@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I also have internal only traffic, but I still use let’s encrypt. I self signed for a couple of years, but switching to proper certificates made things much simpler and better. Especially on mobile. I use a combination of my own domain and caddy. and duckdns, since my domain registrar does not have an api caddy can use, but I can point my domain to my duckdns domain and it works 👍

    source

    • bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      I’m the bad guy that installed my CA where needed lol but nice!

      source
  • Shimitar@feddit.it ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Self signed certs needs to be allowed explicitly. If the app didn’t took those into consideration then there is not much you can do.

    Another point against immich I guess if you need self signed.

    I will try to support immich actively in the future, even if my free time is really small nowadays.

    source

    • bravesilvernest@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      My current backup strategy is BTSync, which while super easy to get going is a pain in the ass to look up old images. Using direct IP on the app works perfectly, and the DNS lookup only works internally anyways.

      All that to say that I’m probably going to use it and remove the btsync approach in a couple months.

      source

      • Shimitar@feddit.it ⁨9⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Immich is very good for photo backup. I would say it’s it best use. Be aware of the limitations above tough.

        I find very annoying not having a bare metal installation way. Will try to make it work in the future maybe.

        source