Comment on A New York Times copyright lawsuit could kill OpenAI
tonytins@pawb.social 9 months ago
The problem with copyright is that everything is automatically copyrighted. The copyright logo is purely symbolic, at this point. Both side are technically right, even though the courts have ruled that anything an AI outputs is actually in the public domain.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
Works involving the use of AI are copyrightable. Also, the Copyright Office’s guidance isn’t law. Their guidance reflects only the office’s interpretation based on its experience, it isn’t binding in the courts or other parties. Guidance from the office is not a substitute for legal advice, and it does not create any rights or obligations for anyone. They are the lowest rung on the ladder for deciding what law means.
tonytins@pawb.social 9 months ago
I wasn’t talking about Copyright Office. I was talking about the courts.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 months ago
This ruling is about something else entirely. He tried to argue that the AI itself was the author and that copyright should pass to him as he hired it.
An excerpt from your article:
Copyright is afforded to humans, you can’t register an AI as an author, the same as you can’t register a monkey can’t hold copyright.
tonytins@pawb.social 9 months ago
Yes. I know. That’s I’ve been saying this whole time.