[deleted]
Comment on A New York Times copyright lawsuit could kill OpenAI
Grimy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
This would bring up the cost of entry for making a model and nothing more. OpenAI will buy the data if they have too and so will google. The money will only go to the owners of the new York Times and its shareholders, none of the journalists who will be let go in the coming years will see a dime.
We must keep the entry into the AI game as low as possible or the only two players will be Microsoft and Google. And as our economy becomes increasingly AI driven, this will cement them owning it.
Pragmatism or slavery, these are the two options.
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
He’s not arguing for OpenAI, but for the rest of us. AI is a public technology, but we’re on the verge of losing our ability to participate due to things like and the megacorp’s attempts at regulatory capture. Which they might just get. Their campaign against AI is a lot like their attempts to destroy encryption. Support open source development, It’s our only chance. Their AI will never work for us. John Carmack put it best.
Fuck "Open"AI, fuck, Microsoft. Pragmatism or slavery.
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
If Grimy supports abolishing OpenAI and making their unethically gained data set available to all, I would be interested in hearing that.
There are also ways to hold giant megacorporations to a different set of standards than independent developers. Corporations valued at millions to billions of dollars should have higher entry fees getting access to someone else’s work than a private individual.
Grimy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
If you want to know my personal political stance, I think every company with more than 100 or so employees should be owned by the state. I’m for the dismantling of the stock market and the owner caste. I’m also a realist and understand those things won’t come to pass anytime soon. OpenAI will remain and they will happily eat all the fines if it guarantees them a monopoly.
I wasn’t playing devil’s advocate. My point is these legislation only help companies like OpenAI while bringing no benefit whatsoever to any of us.
There are also ways to hold giant megacorporations to a different set of standards than independent developers.
Yes but that isn’t what is being currently proposed, is it?
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
I was wondering when the OpenAI evangelists were going to show up. The last time you talked about OpenAI, you played devil’s advocate for it.
And this time… You’re playing devil’s advocate for them again.
LWD@lemm.ee 10 months ago
[deleted]Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
Did you delete your last people replied to repost it again without replies? Link to the last thread.
Grimy@lemmy.world 10 months ago
He deleted that one too lmao
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
This person SUCKS. This has to be the shittiest behavior I’ve seen on Lemmy.
Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 months ago
LWD@lemm.ee is deleting his comments and reposting the same comment to dodge replies. Link to the last thread.
Image